VII. ECONOMIC EVALUATION
7.1 General
The
sheet size of the Mahaweli Ganga scheme is a clear
testimony to the impact which the project could have on the economy of
The
economic implication of project, both in terms of cost and benefits,
are given in table 3. the cost and benefits for all
three phases are estimated in terms of prevailing market prices.
|
TABLE 3 |
|||||||||
|
Main features of the Three Phases of the Mahaweli Ganga Scheme |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Project 1 |
Project 2 |
Project 3 |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase III |
Enter Scheme |
|
|
1 |
Irrigated area (1,000 acres) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
186 |
88 |
54 |
328 |
230 |
342 |
900 |
|
|
|
New area brought under irrigation |
84 |
74 |
26 |
184 |
209 |
261 |
654 |
|
|
|
Improvement to existing facilities |
102 |
14 |
28 |
144 |
21 |
81 |
246 |
|
|
|
Equivalent irrigated area |
115 |
78 |
34 |
227 |
215 |
301 |
743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Hydro - Electric power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installed capacity (megawatts) |
40 |
120 |
40 |
200 |
15 |
293 |
508 |
|
|
|
Annual energy production (million kwh) |
200 |
470 |
150 |
820 |
48 |
1,169 |
2,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Capital cost (million rupees current
prices) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
576 |
676 |
298 |
1,550 |
920 |
3,113 |
5,583 |
|
|
|
Allocated to agriculture |
540 |
476 |
233 |
1,249 |
898 |
2,659 |
4,806 |
|
|
|
Allocated to power |
36 |
200 |
65 |
301 |
22 |
454 |
--- |
|
|
|
Rupees per acre or equivalent irrigated land |
4,690 |
6,100 |
6,850 |
5,500 |
4,180 |
8,830 |
6,470 |
|
|
|
Rupees per K w of installed capacity |
900 |
1,600 |
1,630 |
1,505 |
1,465 |
1,550 |
1,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Benefits (million rupees current
prices) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
130 |
118 |
42 |
290 |
291 |
521 |
1,102 |
|
|
|
Value added in agriculture |
118 |
92 |
34 |
244 |
288 |
456 |
988 |
|
|
|
Revenue from sale of power |
12 |
26 |
8 |
46 |
3 |
65 |
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Capital cost /benefit ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
4.4 |
5.7 |
6.9 |
5.3 |
3.2 |
6.0 |
5.1 |
|
|
|
Agriculture |
4.6 |
5.2 |
6.9 |
5.1 |
3.1 |
5.8 |
4.9 |
|
|
|
Power |
3.0 |
7.7 |
8.1 |
6.5 |
7.3 |
7.0 |
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Internal rate of return (of capital cost) |
17 |
13 |
12 |
14 |
20 |
12 |
15 |
|
NOTE : 1.
7.2 Capital Cost
Benefit Ratio
The
capital cost benefit ratio of the entire scheme is estimated to be 5.1 (4.9 for
agriculture and 6.8 for hydropower). For
Phase 1 the value
of the ratio is 5.3 and varies among the three projects. The
ratio being lower in the case of project 1 in comparison with projects 2 and 3.
7.3
Unit cost
The
unit cost of irrigated agriculture for the scheme as a whole is estimated as Rs. 6,470 per acre bet varies considerably from one phase
to another. It is Rs. 8,830 for phase III and Rs. 4180 for phase II. For phase I the unit cost per
irrigated acre is estimated at Rs. 5,500.in the case
of electric power the unit cost per irrigated acre is estimated at Rs. 5,500. in the case of electric
power the unit cost per k w of installed
capacity will be Rs. 1,530 and there is no drastic
variation in unit cost between the three phases of the scheme.
7.4
Internal Rate of Return
The internal rate of
return is a rough measurement of the overall social profitability of the
project to the national economy. This rate has been calculated for all three
phases of the scheme project to the national economy. This rate has been
calculated for all three phases of the scheme (as well as for the three
projects of phase 1). For the scheme as a whole the internal rate of return is
15 percent, which indicates that the scheme could be considered as a bankable
project.
7.5
Level of Production
In 1980 the value of the expected
crop production for the three projects of phase1 reach approximately 7 percent
of the total value added in agriculture in that year and 205 percent of GNP.
TABLE 4
Contribution of phase I of Mahaweli Ganaga in meeting
The food deficit by 1980
(1,000 metric tons)
![]()
Crop Demand Production Deficit (--) Percent of
Mahaweli
without with
deficit met
Phase I
Rice 1,860 200 910 10 0
Sugar 320 34 314
280 8
Maze 110 23 95 72 24.2
Chilies 60 8 35 27 22.9
Vegetable 1200 133 410 277 32.4
Pulses
50 5 44 39 11.4
![]()
For
1980 the electric power requirements of
1 for Phase I and II one acre of improved
irrigation is equivalent to 0.3 of new irrigation to 0.3
of new irrigated acre. This co-efficient is raised to 0.5 for phase